United States Ninth Circuit
WILDERNESS SOC'Y v. US FISH & WILDLIFE SERV., 01-35266
Defendant's decision to permit a fish species enhancement was a reasonable interpretation of statutory ambiguities under the Wilderness Act (16 U.S.C. sections 1131-1136) and the National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act (16 U.S.C. sections 668dd-668ee). (Amended opinion)
Appellate Information
- Decided 01/13/2003
- Published 03/16/2004
Judges
- Before SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, PREGERSON, REINHARDT, T.G. NELSON, HAWKINS, SILVERMAN, WARDLAW, W. FLETCHER, GOULD, BERZON, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Ninth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Rebecca L. Bernard and Jack K. Sterne, Trustees For Alaska, Anchorage, AK, for the plaintiffs-appellants.
- For Appellees:
- Kathryn E. Kovacs, U.S. Department of Justice, Environment and Natural Resources Division, Washington, D.C., for the defendant-appellee.