United States Ninth Circuit

An agreement made pursuant to 29 C.F.R. section 785.23 to compensate an officer for overtime spent caring for her assigned police dog must, at a minimum, take into account some approximation of the hours she actually worked or could reasonably be required to work.

Appellate Information

• Argued 10/09/2003
• Decided 03/04/2004
• Published 03/04/2004

Judges

• Before: B. FLETCHER and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges, and POLLAK, District Judge.

Court

• United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Day R. Williams, Carson City, NV, for the plaintiff-appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Mark Forsberg, Deputy District Attorney, Carson City, NV, for the defendants-appellees.