United States Ninth Circuit

Whether or not plaintiff received "physician's care" as required by the policy's definition of disability is a disputed issue of fact that warrants a jury trial. Accordingly, summary judgment for defendant is reversed and the matter remanded.

Appellate Information

• Argued 12/04/2003
• Decided 01/20/2004
• Published 01/20/2004

Judges

• D.W. NELSON, Senior Circuit Judge., Before BRIGHT,D.W. NELSON, and RYMER, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Steven J. Parsons, Las Vegas, NV, for the plaintiff-appellant., Alan D. Cates, Las Vegas, NV, for the plaintiff-appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Patricia K. Norris, Phoenix, AZ, for the defendant-appellee., Ann-Martha Andrews, Phoenix, AZ, for the defendant-appellee., Kimberly A. Demarchi, Phoenix, AZ, for the defendant-appellee., Scott Bales, Phoenix, AZ, for the defendant-appellee.