United States Ninth Circuit

In a sexual harassment case, brought by the EEOC on behalf of intervenor, there was no legally sufficient basis for the jury to find a connection with an employment relationship between defendant and intervenor and as a result, the district court erred when it denied defendant's motion for judgment as a matter of law.

Appellate Information

• Decided 11/24/2003
• Published 11/24/2003

Judges

• ALDISERT, Circuit Judge:, Before:  ALDISERT,GRABER and GOULD, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• Bradley F. Tellam,Barran Liebman LLP, Portland, OR, for the defendant-appellant., Thane W. Tienson, Landye Bennett Blumstein LLP, Portland, OR, for the plaintiff-intervenor-appellee.