Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

United States Ninth Circuit


MURPHY v. SCHNEIDER NAT'L INC., 02-35116

In an employment injury action, the district court's ruling on the validity of the forum selection clause and defendant's motion to dismiss based on forum non conveniens is affirmed in part, vacated in part and remanded.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 11/21/2003
  • Published 11/21/2003

Judges

  • GOULD, Circuit Judge:, Before: ALDISERT,HALL, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Montgomery W. Cobb, Cobb & Bosśe, LLP, Portland, OR, for the plaintiff-appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Wade R. Keenon, The Gilroy Law Firm, P.C., Portland, OR, for defendant-appellee Schneider., James N. Westwood, Leta E. Gorman, Stoel Rives LLP, Portland, OR, for defendant-appellee Trane.
Copied to clipboard