United States Ninth Circuit
MURPHY v. SCHNEIDER NAT'L INC., 02-35116
In an employment injury action, the district court's ruling on the validity of the forum selection clause and defendant's motion to dismiss based on forum non conveniens is affirmed in part, vacated in part and remanded.
Appellate Information
- Decided 11/21/2003
- Published 11/21/2003
Judges
- GOULD, Circuit Judge:, Before: ALDISERT,HALL, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Ninth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Montgomery W. Cobb, Cobb & Bosśe, LLP, Portland, OR, for the plaintiff-appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Wade R. Keenon, The Gilroy Law Firm, P.C., Portland, OR, for defendant-appellee Schneider., James N. Westwood, Leta E. Gorman, Stoel Rives LLP, Portland, OR, for defendant-appellee Trane.