United States Ninth Circuit
GALLO v. US DIST. COURT FOR THE DIST. OF ARIZONA, 01-17332
District court ruling that appellant may no longer appear before the District of Arizona without successful completion of a pro hac vice application is affirmed, as the constitutional implications of the district court decision was rationally related to a legitimate interest such that it passes constitutional scrutiny.
Appellate Information
- Argued 12/05/2002
- Decided 11/19/2003
- Published 11/19/2003
Judges
- Before: BRUNETTI and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges, and EZRA, District Judge.
Court
- United States Ninth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- David J. Gallo, Del Mar, CA, movant-appellant., Daniel J. McAuliffe, Andrew M. Jacobs, Snell & Wilmer, LLP, Phoenix, AZ, for the real party in interest., Ernest Calderon, Lindsay E. Jones, Jennings, Strouss & Salmon, PLC, Phoenix, AZ, for amicus curiae State Bar of Arizona.