Skip to main content

United States Ninth Circuit


AM. CONSUMER PUBL'G ASS'N v. MARGOSIAN, 01-36113

Defendants were entitled to summary judgment on plaintiffs' claim for damages for defamation under 42 U.S.C. section 1983, because plaintiffs presented no evidence that defendants deprived them of a constitutionally protected liberty or property interest in restricting direct mail magazine solicitations.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 11/18/2003
  • Published 11/18/2003

Judges

  • GRABER, Circuit Judge., Before HALL, GRABER, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Alan R. Herson, Jacksonville, OR, for plaintiffs-appellants.

  • For Appellees:
  • Brendan C. Dunn, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, OR, for defendants-appellees.
Copied to clipboard