Skip to main content

United States Ninth Circuit


FOSTER v. CARSON, 03-35457

In consolidated cases challenging the constitutionality of an Oregon judicial-budget austerity plan, the "Budget Reduction Plan," brought by plaintiffs who had criminal proceedings suspended and were not afforded counsel, dismissal is affirmed where the cases are moot.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 10/17/2003
  • Published 10/17/2003

Judges

  • Before HALL, GRABER, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Elden M. Rosenthal,Rosenthal & Greene, P.C., and Thomas M. Christ, Cosgrave Vergeer Kester LLP, Portland, OR, for the plaintiffs-appellants.

  • For Appellees:
  • Janet A. Metcalf, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, OR, for the defendants-appellees.
Copied to clipboard