United States Ninth Circuit

Claims of retaliation, denial of equal protection and due process grounded in acts pertaining to a polo field application and residential building permit are not "as applied" takings. Rather, they are separate claims grounded in allegations of discrete constitutional violations. (Amended opinion)

Appellate Information

• Argued 02/05/2003
• Decided 06/25/2003
• Published 09/23/2003

Judges

• Before HALL, THOMPSON, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• A. Barry Cappello, Santa Barbara, CA, and Norman Pine, Sherman Oaks, CA, for the plaintiffs-appellants.


• For Appellees:
  
• David Pettit, Los Angeles, CA, for the defendants-appellees.