United States Ninth Circuit
HOTEL & MOTEL ASS'N OF OAKLAND v. CITY OF OAKLAND, 02-15220
City ordinances that place certain maintenance and habitability restrictions and requirements on hotels, motels, and rooming houses are not unconstitutionally vague, do not amount to an unconstitutional taking under the Fifth Amendment, and do not violate Equal Protection.
Appellate Information
- Argued 04/10/2003
- Decided 09/17/2003
- Published 09/17/2003
Judges
- Before NOONAN, McKEOWN, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Ninth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Frank A. Weiser, Los Angeles, CA, for the appellants.
- For Appellees:
- John A. Russo, City Attorney; Randolph W. Hall, Assistant City Attorney; Arlene Rosen, Deputy City Attorney; and Christopher Kee, Deputy City Attorney, Oakland, CA, for the appellee.