United States Ninth Circuit

18 U.S.C. section 2252(a)(4)(B), criminalizing intrastate possession of "home grown" child pornography not intended for distribution or exchange, is not on its face an unconstitutional exercise of congressional power, and the definition of "sexually explicit conduct" at section 2256(2)(A) is not substantially overbroad.

Appellate Information

• Decided 09/10/2003
• Published 09/10/2003

Judges

• Before LAY,HAWKINS, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• Kevin M. Bringuel, Federal Defenders of San Diego, San Diego, California, for the defendant-appellant., Anne Kristina Perry, Assistant United States Attorney, San Diego, California, for the plaintiff-appellee.