United States Ninth Circuit

Although admission of an accomplice's statement was improper under the Confrontation Clause, error was harmless under contemporary Supreme Court authority.

Appellate Information

• Argued 03/04/2003
• Decided 09/08/2003
• Published 09/08/2003

Judges

• MICHAEL DALY HAWKINS, Circuit Judge., Before: LAY,HAWKINS, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Thomas T. Ono, Los Angeles, CA, for the petitioner-appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• David F. Glassman, Deputy Attorney General for the State of California, Los Angeles, CA, for the respondent-appellee.