Skip to main content

United States Ninth Circuit


NAT'L ASS'N OF HOME BUILDERS v. NORTON, 02-15212

Although the Fish and Wildlife Service did not arbitrarily find the Arizona pygmy-owl to be discrete, it did arbitrarily find the discrete population to be significant.

Appellate Information

  • Argued 03/10/2003
  • Decided 08/19/2003
  • Published 08/19/2003

Judges

  • Before NOONAN, TASHIMA, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Norman D. James, Fennemore Craig, Phoenix, AZ, for the plaintiffs-appellants.

  • For Appellees:
  • Jeffrey R. Keohane, U.S. Department of Justice, Environment & Natural Resources Division, Washington, D.C., for the defendants-appellees., Michael P. Senatore, Defenders of Wildlife, Washington, D.C., for the intervenors-appellees.
Copied to clipboard