United States Ninth Circuit

A 28 U.S.C. section 2255 petitioner's proffered evidence failed to show that testimony was false, thus no evidentiary hearing was required; a Brady-Bagley claim fails where evidence in question would not have made a difference in the outcome of the trial.

Appellate Information

• Argued 02/15/2000
• Decided 08/05/2003
• Published 08/05/2003

Judges

• GRABER, Circuit Judge:, Before:  BROWNING, GOODWIN, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• Kenneth M. Miller, Law Office of Kenneth M. Miller, Santa Ana, CA, for the defendant-appellant., Lawrence Ng, Assistant United States Attorney, Criminal Division, Los Angeles, CA, for the plaintiff-appellee.