United States Ninth Circuit
US v. MARSHALL, 01-56061
In assessing the monetary equivalent of forfeited real property, the proper standard is the value of the property when the government sold it.
Appellate Information
- Decided 07/23/2003
- Published 07/23/2003
Judges
- Before: SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, and THOMPSON and GRABER, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Ninth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellees:
- Pierre Clifton Marshall, pro se, Taft, CA, defendant-appellant., Steven R. Welk, Assistant United States Attorney, Asset Forfeiture Section, Los Angeles, CA, for the plaintiff-appellee.