United States Ninth Circuit

Neither the Board of Immigration Appeals's interpretation of "exceptional and extremely unusual hardship" for purposes of cancellation of removal, nor its summary affirmance "streamlining" procedures, violate due process.

Appellate Information

• Decided 07/18/2003
• Published 07/18/2003

Judges

• Before T.G. NELSON, SILVERMAN, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Walter Rafael Pineda, Law Offices of Walter Rafael Pineda, Redwood City, CA, for the petitioner.


• For Appellees:
  
• Robert D. McCallum, Jr., Richard M. Evans, and Michael T. Dougherty, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for the respondent.