Skip to main content

United States Ninth Circuit


US v. DAVIS, 02-50451

An indictment for escape sufficiently tracked the language of 18 U.S.C. section 751(a), and unambiguously set forth the proper criminal intent.

Appellate Information

  • Argued 06/04/2003
  • Decided 07/17/2003
  • Published 07/17/2003

Judges

  • Before THOMPSON, TROTT, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellees:
  • Carol C. Lam, United States Attorney, Christopher P. Tenorio, Assistant United States Attorney, San Diego, CA, for the plaintiff-appellee., Todd W. Burns, Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., San Diego, CA, for the defendant-appellant.
Copied to clipboard