Skip to main content

United States Ninth Circuit


HIMES v. THOMPSON, 01-35311

A decision that petitioner violated terms of his parole, made based on parole regulations more onerous than those in place at the time petitioner committed the offense for which he was incarcerated, violated the Ex Post Facto clause of the U.S. Constitution.

Appellate Information

  • Argued 03/05/2002
  • Decided 07/10/2003
  • Published 07/10/2003

Judges

  • Before B. FLETCHER, O'SCANNLAIN and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Bryan E. Lessley, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Office of the Federal Public Defender, Eugene, OR, for the petitioner-appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Janet A. Metcalf, Assistant Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General for the State of Oregon, Salem, OR, for the respondent-appellee.
Copied to clipboard