United States Ninth Circuit
US v. RILEY, 02-30072
The district court did not err in including the conspiracy's check cashing activities in determining amount of loss attributable to defendant for sentence enhancement purposes, but evidence did not support enhancement for possessing five or more means of false identification.
Appellate Information
- Argued 01/08/2003
- Decided 07/09/2003
- Published 07/09/2003
Judges
- TASHIMA, Circuit Judge., Before: WALLACE, TROTT, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Ninth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellees:
- Todd L. Greenberg, Assistant United States Attorney, Seattle, WA, for the plaintiff-appellee., Allen M. Ressler, Browne & Ressler, Seattle, WA, for the defendant-appellant.