Skip to main content

United States Ninth Circuit


US v. RILEY, 02-30072

The district court did not err in including the conspiracy's check cashing activities in determining amount of loss attributable to defendant for sentence enhancement purposes, but evidence did not support enhancement for possessing five or more means of false identification.

Appellate Information

  • Argued 01/08/2003
  • Decided 07/09/2003
  • Published 07/09/2003

Judges

  • TASHIMA, Circuit Judge., Before: WALLACE, TROTT, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellees:
  • Todd L. Greenberg, Assistant United States Attorney, Seattle, WA, for the plaintiff-appellee., Allen M. Ressler, Browne & Ressler, Seattle, WA, for the defendant-appellant.
Copied to clipboard