United States Ninth Circuit
BIGGS v. TERHUNE, 02-15881
A habeas petitioner's procedural due process rights were not violated through the California Board of Prison Terms's failure to find him suitable for parole where, though several of the Board's findings of unsuitability were unsupported, some evidence supported the decision that petitioner was not entitled to relief.
Appellate Information
- Argued 05/16/2003
- Decided 06/30/2003
- Published 06/30/2003
Judges
- HUG, Circuit Judge:, Before HUG, GIBSON, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Ninth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Ann C. McClintock, Assistant Public Defender, Sacramento, CA, for the petitioner-appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Jessica N. Blonien, Deputy Attorney General, San Francisco, CA, for the respondents-appellees.