Skip to main content

United States Ninth Circuit


CLARK v. MURPHY, 00-16727

A murder suspect's statement that he "thought" he would like to talk to a lawyer did not constitute an unambiguous and unequivocal request for counsel, and a confession was not involuntary where typical indicia of coercion were wholly absent. (Amended opinion)

Appellate Information

  • Argued 11/05/2002
  • Decided 01/23/2003
  • Published 06/10/2003

Judges

  • Before:  STAPLETON,O'SCANNLAIN and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • James M. Jellison argued the cause for the appellant.  Anders Rosenquist, Jr., Rosenquist & Associates, Phoenix, AZ, was on the briefs.

  • For Appellees:
  • Ginger Jarvis, Assistant Arizona Attorney General, argued the cause for the appellee.  Janet Napolitano, Arizona Attorney General;  Randall M. Howe, Arizona Chief Counsel, Criminal Appeals Section;  Diane M. Ramsey, Assistant Arizona Attorney General, were on the brief.
Copied to clipboard