Skip to main content

United States Ninth Circuit


KAPLAN v. CITY OF N. LAS VEGAS, 02-16048

A peace officer could not perform his essential job functions without accommodation at the time of his termination, and the city did not have a duty to accommodate him, thus an ADA claim was not actionable.

Appellate Information

  • Argued 02/12/2003
  • Decided 04/01/2003
  • Published 04/01/2003

Judges

  • Before SILVERMAN, GOULD, Circuit Judges, and WEINER, Senior District Judge.

Court

  • United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • James C. Gallo, Law Office of Andrew M. Leavitt, Las Vegas, Nevada, for the plaintiff-appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Malani L. Kotchka, Smith & Kotchka, Las Vegas, Nevada, for the defendants-appellees.
Copied to clipboard