Skip to main content

United States Ninth Circuit


US v. DANIELSON, 01-30151/30176

In a claim that the government violated defendant's Sixth Amendment right to counsel through deliberate interference with his attorney-client relationship after obtaining information about his trial strategy, the government has the heavy burden of showing non-use.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 03/24/2003
  • Published 03/24/2003

Judges

Court

  • United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel

Copied to clipboard