United States Ninth Circuit
DIRUZZA v. COUNTY OF TEHAMA, 01-17461
The holding of a California trial court had a collateral estoppel effect that precludes plaintiff from continuing to pursue her action in federal court, even where a California appellate court applied different reasoning in affirming the trial court decision.
Appellate Information
- Argued 11/05/2002
- Decided 03/21/2003
- Published 03/21/2003
Judges
- Before McKEOWN and PAEZ, Circuit Judges, and POLLAK, District Judge.
Court
- United States Ninth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Allison Fairchild, Alameda, CA, and David A. Prentice, Prentice & Schaap, Sacramento, CA, for the appellant.
- For Appellees:
- J. Scott Smith and Laurence L. Angelo, Angelo, Kilday & Kilduff, Sacramento, CA, for appellee, County of Tehama., Stephen E. Horan,Porter, Scott, Weiberg & Delehant, Sacramento, CA, for appellees, Robert Heard and Jerry Floyd.