United States Ninth Circuit
CHEIN v. SHUMSKY, 01-56320
Petitioner's due process claims based on admission of judge's testimony and prosecutor misconduct were procedurally defaulted, and sufficient evidence supported a finding of perjury as to false testimony, thus dismissal of a 28 U.S.C. section 2254 petition is affirmed.
Appellate Information
- Decided 03/14/2003
- Published 03/14/2003
Judges
- BERZON, Circuit Judge., Before SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, O'SCANNLAIN, RYMER, T.G. NELSON, HAWKINS, McKEOWN, WARDLAW, GOULD, BERZON, RAWLINSON, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Ninth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Charles M. Sevilla,Cleary & Sevilla, San Diego, CA, for the petitioner-appellant., Cliff Gardner, San Francisco, CA, for the amicus curiae.
- For Appellees:
- Brentford Ferriera and Matthew G. Monforton, Office of the District Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for the respondents-appellees.