United States Ninth Circuit

A challenge to a regional planning agency's regional plan stems from the same transactional nucleus of facts as an action previously dismissed on statute of limitations grounds, and is barred by the doctrine of res judicata.

Appellate Information

• Decided 02/28/2003
• Published 02/28/2003

Judges

• Before REINHARDT, HAWKINS, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Lawrence L. Hoffman, Tahoe City, CA, for the plaintiffs-appellants.


• For Appellees:
  
• E. Clement Shute, Jr., Fran Layton, Shute, Mihaly & Weinberger LLP, San Francisco, CA;  and Daniel L. Siegel, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, State of California, Sacramento, California, for the defendants-appellees.