United States Ninth Circuit

The presumption of collateral consequences does not apply to prison disciplinary proceedings, and where petitioner has not alleged collateral consequences sufficient to avoid dismissal of a 28 U.S.C. section 2254 petition on the ground of mootness.

Appellate Information

• Argued 10/11/2002
• Decided 02/06/2003
• Published 02/06/2003

Judges

• TASHIMA, Circuit Judge., Before: TASHIMA, THOMAS, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Allison Claire, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Sacramento, CA, for the petitioner-appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• James E. Flynn, Deputy Attorney General, Sacramento, CA, for the respondents-appellees.