United States Ninth Circuit
CLARK v. MURPHY, 00-16727
A murder suspect's statement that he "thought" he would like to talk to a lawyer did not constitute an unambiguous and unequivocal request for counsel, and a confession was not involuntary where typical indicia of coercion were wholly absent.
Appellate Information
- Argued 11/05/2002
- Decided 01/23/2003
- Published 01/23/2003
Judges
- Before: STAPLETON,O'SCANNLAIN and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Ninth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- James M. Jellison argued the cause for the appellant. Anders Rosenquist, Jr., Rosenquist & Associates, Phoenix, AZ, was on the briefs.
- For Appellees:
- Ginger Jarvis, Assistant Arizona Attorney General, argued the cause for the appellee. Janet Napolitano, Arizona Attorney General; Randall M. Howe, Arizona Chief Counsel, Criminal Appeals Section; Diane M. Ramsey, Assistant Arizona Attorney General, were on the brief.