Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

United States Ninth Circuit


US v. MANCHESTER FARMING P'SHIP, 01-30414, 01-30415, 01-30416

Denial of a Hyde Amendment request for attorneys' fees and costs is affirmed, where appellants failed to show that the government pursued a frivolous case alleging receipt of unlawful farm program payments, or that its approach rose to the level of bad faith.

Appellate Information

  • Argued 11/05/2002
  • Decided 01/10/2003
  • Published 01/10/2003

Judges

  • Before TROTT, T.G. NELSON, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellees:
  • Kenneth R. Olson, Great Falls, Montana, for defendant-appellant Manchester Farming Partnership., Floyd D. Corder, Corder & Allen, Great Falls, Montana, for defendant-appellant Lone Pine Land, Inc., Daniel Donovan, Thompson, Potts & Donovan, P.C., Great Falls, Montana, for defendant-appellant Priest Butte Farm, Inc., William W. Mercer, United States Attorney, District of Montana, for plaintiff-appellee., Carl E. Rostad, Assistant U.S. Attorney, District of Montana, for plaintiff-appellee., Leif M. Johnson, Assistant U.S. Attorney, District of Montana, for plaintiff-appellee., John A. Drennan, Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for plaintiff-appellee.
Copied to clipboard