United States Ninth Circuit

An order revoking a bank fraud defendant's supervised release was erroneous because defendant did not fail to make a timely payment to the court registry, and did not incur new debt. The vacating of a restitution order, and replacement of it with a fine, was erroneous.

Appellate Information

• Decided 12/11/2002
• Published 12/11/2002

Judges

• HILL, Circuit Judge:, Before: HILL,GOULD and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Allen R. Bentley, Seattle, WA, for amicus curiae Eric B. Sandall.


• For Appellees:
  
• Michael Filipovic, Assistant Federal Public Defender, and Vicky W.W. Lai, Research and Writing Attorney, Seattle, WA, for the defendant-appellant., Francis J. Diskin, United States Attorney, Western District of Washington;  Mark N. Bartlett, Assistant United States Attorney, Western District of Washington;  and Karin B. Hoppmann, Criminal Division-Appellate Section of Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for the plaintiff-appellee.