United States Ninth Circuit

The requirement that a bond be posted upon a removable alien's release, after removal was not reasonably foreseeable, was not improper under 8 U.S.C. sections 1231(a) and (6), although a bond is not expressly listed as a condition of supervision in that statute.

Appellate Information

• Decided 11/27/2002
• Published 11/27/2002

Judges

• Before: SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge, and WEINER, District Judge.

Court

• United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Todd W. Burns,Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., San Diego, CA, for the petitioner-appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Patrick K. O'Toole, United States Attorney (when brief was filed), Carol C. Lam, United States Attorney (when opinion was filed), Samuel W. Bettwy, Special Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney's Office, San Diego, CA, for the respondent-appellee.