Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

United States Ninth Circuit


HILL v. ROE, 00-56480

A habeas petitioner was incorrectly charged with the burden of proving that the California Supreme Court's citation to the People v. Hill rule, 9 Cal. 3d 784, was an independent and adequate state procedural ground that would bar appellate review.

Appellate Information

  • Argued 02/05/2002
  • Decided 07/29/2002
  • Published 07/29/2002

Judges

  • Before PREGERSON, RYMER, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Jerry D. Whatley, Santa Barbara, CA, for the petitioner-appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Erika D. Jackson, Deputy Attorney General, Los Angeles, CA, for the respondent-appellee.
Copied to clipboard