United States Ninth Circuit
HILL v. ROE, 00-56480
A habeas petitioner was incorrectly charged with the burden of proving that the California Supreme Court's citation to the People v. Hill rule, 9 Cal. 3d 784, was an independent and adequate state procedural ground that would bar appellate review.
Appellate Information
- Argued 02/05/2002
- Decided 07/29/2002
- Published 07/29/2002
Judges
- Before PREGERSON, RYMER, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Ninth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Jerry D. Whatley, Santa Barbara, CA, for the petitioner-appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Erika D. Jackson, Deputy Attorney General, Los Angeles, CA, for the respondent-appellee.