Skip to main content

United States Ninth Circuit


US v. HINOSTROZA, 01-10482

A firearms possession conviction was not an unreasonable regulation of the right to bear arms under the Second Amendment, and admission of allegedly false (uncharged) statements on firearms applications was proper.

Appellate Information

  • Argued 06/10/2002
  • Decided 07/23/2002
  • Published 07/23/2002

Judges

  • Before GOODWIN, HAWKINS and RAYMOND C. FISHER, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellees:
  • Petra M. Reinecke (argued) and Brian H. Getz, Law Offices of Brian H. Getz, San Francisco, CA, for the defendant-appellant., W. Douglas Sprague (argued), Assistant U.S. Attorney, Sacramento, CA, for the plaintiff-appellee.
Copied to clipboard