United States Ninth Circuit
US v. MARTINEZ-MARTINEZ, 01-10294
Imposition of an enhanced sentence for illegal reentry after prior convictions, under 8 U.S.C. section 1326, does not violate Apprendi; a motion for downward departure, based on the legitimacy of a prior state court conviction, constitutes an impermissible collateral attack.
Appellate Information
- Decided 07/15/2002
- Published 07/15/2002
Judges
- Before: HAWKINS and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges, and RESTANI, Judge.
Court
- United States Ninth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellees:
- Larry Kupers, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Oakland, CA, for the defendant-appellant., Candace Kelly, Assistant United States Attorney, San Francisco, CA, for the plaintiff-appellee.