United States Ninth Circuit
MIRANDA v. CASTRO, 01-56124
A habeas petitioner's reliance on the erroneous advice of appointed counsel did not amount to "extraordinary circumstances beyond appellant's control" sufficient to warrant equitable tolling of the one-year statute of limitations on filing a federal habeas petition.
Appellate Information
- Decided 06/12/2002
- Published 06/12/2002
Judges
- Before O'SCANNLAIN, RYMER, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Ninth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Marilee Marshall,Marilee Marshall & Associates, Pasadena, CA, for the petitioner-appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Bill Lockyer, Attorney General of California; Robert R. Anderson, Chief Assistant Attorney General; Pamela C. Hamanaka, Assistant Attorney General; and Deborah J. Chuang and G. Tracey Letteau, Deputy Attorneys General, Los Angeles, CA, for the respondents-appellees.