United States Ninth Circuit
PAIGE v. CALIFORNIA, 01-55312
In a class action alleging that the California Highway Patrol's (CHP) promotional process discriminates against non-whites, an internal pool is the appropriate comparative group for determining disparate impact on non-white officers, and defendant's arguments contesting plaintiffs' statistical analyses are rejected.
Appellate Information
- Argued 01/23/2002
- Decided 05/31/2002
- Published 05/31/2002
Judges
- Before REINHARDT, KOZINSKI and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Ninth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellees:
- Joel M. Cohn,Esq., Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld, Washington, DC, for the defendants-appellants., Della Bahan, Esq., Bahan & Associates, Pasadena, CA, for the plaintiff-appellee.