Skip to main content

United States Ninth Circuit


US v. HERMANEK, 99-10092, 99-10137, 99-10142, 99-10197, 99-10143, 99-10146

Government's failure to comply with recording and sealing requirements, in wiretaps of cell phone and pager communications, did not mandate suppression where non-compliance was adequately explained; portions of expert testimony should be excluded where the expert's interpretations of particular code words were not supported by reliable methods.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 05/15/2002
  • Published 05/15/2002

Judges

  • FISHER, Circuit Judge., Before: POLITZ,W. FLETCHER and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellees:
  • J. Douglas Wilson, Assistant United States Attorney, Chief, Appellate Division, Oakland, CA, for plaintiff-appellee United States of America., Dennis P. Riordan, Donald M. Horgan and Dylan L. Schaffer, San Francisco, CA, for defendant-appellant Robert Hermanek., Katherine Alfieri, San Francisco, CA, for defendant-appellant Robert Rutherford., Walter K. Pyle, Berkeley, CA, for defendant-appellant Sheldon Johnson., Amitai Schwartz, Berkeley, CA, for defendant-appellant Anthony Flowers., Alan Dressler, San Francisco, CA, for defendant-appellant Jerry Fiorillo.
Copied to clipboard