United States Ninth Circuit

Because the majority of evidence on the plaintiff's claim for intentional interference with business and existing contracts was inadmissible hearsay or lacked proper authentication, and the only admissible evidence failed to raise a triable issue of fact, summary judgment in favor of defendant bank was proper.

Appellate Information

• Argued 01/18/2002
• Decided 04/05/2002
• Published 04/05/2002

Judges

• Before GOODWIN, SNEED and TROTT, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Kevin J. Mirch, Reno, NV, for plaintiff-appellant Robin Orr.


• For Appellees:
  
• Patricia Gillette, Tracy S. Achorn, Heller Ehrman White & McAuliffe LLP, San Francisco, CA, for defendant-appellee Bank of America, NT & SA.