United States Ninth Circuit

Because the majority of evidence in the plaintiff's claim for intentional interference with business and existing contracts was inadmissible hearsay or lacked proper authentication, summary judgement in favor of the defendant bank was proper.

Appellate Information

• Argued 01/18/2002
• Decided 03/05/2002
• Published 03/05/2002

Judges

• Before GOODWIN, SNEED and TROTT, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Kevin J. Mirch, Reno, NV, for plaintiff-appellant Robin Orr.


• For Appellees:
  
• Patricia Gillette, Tracy S. Achorn, Heller Ehrman White & McAuliffe LLP, San Francisco, CA, for defendant-appellee Bank of America, NT & SA.