United States Ninth Circuit
US v. ROMERO, 99-30319
Although the defendant was not physically present during the actual drug transaction, and he intended to steal money from the purchase, his presence at earlier buying attempts was sufficient to support a conspiracy to distribute charge.
Appellate Information
- Argued 01/11/2001
- Decided 03/05/2002
- Published 03/05/2002
Judges
- RAWLINSON, Circuit Judge., Before McKEOWN, W. FLETCHER and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Ninth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellees:
- Anna M. Robinson,William C. Broberg, Siderius Lonergan, Seattle, WA, for the defendant-appellant., Katrina C. Pflaumer, United States Attorney, Annette L. Hayes, Assistant United States Attorney, Seattle, WA, for the plaintiff-appellee.