United States Ninth Circuit
BROWN v. ROE, 00-16943
The district court abused its discretion in failing to hear an uneducated pro se petitioner's equitable tolling claim as a part of its de novo review of his habeas corpus petition.
Appellate Information
- Decided 01/29/2002
- Published 01/29/2002
Judges
- Before POLITZ,W. FLETCHER, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Ninth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Quin Denver; David M. Porter, Office of the Federal Defender, for Petitioner-Appellant Donyel V. Brown.
- For Appellees:
- Bill Lockyer; David P. Druliner; Robert R. Anderson; Arnold O. Overoye; Erik R. Brunkal, Attorney General of the State of California, for Respondent Appellee Ernie Roe, Warden.