Skip to main content

United States Ninth Circuit


US v. BYRNE, 00-16008

In a quiet title action for land created by avulsion, the court's analysis should begin on the patent date of the land, and it should not consider pre-patent avulsive river movements.

Appellate Information

  • Argued 10/15/2001
  • Decided 01/28/2002
  • Published 01/28/2002

Judges

  • Before RONEY,HUG and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Lois J. Schiffer, Assistant Attorney General;  John C. Cruden, Acting Assistant Attorney General;  Jeffrey Dobbins, Patrick Barry, Kathryn E. Kovacs, U.S. Department of Justice, Environment & Natural Resources Division, Washington, D.C., for the plaintiff-appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • James T. Braselton, Phoenix, Arizona;  Charles W. Gurtler, Jr., Bullhead City, Arizona, for the defendants-appellees., Robert M. Hall, Pro se, Albuquerque, New Mexico, defendant-appellee.
Copied to clipboard