Skip to main content

United States Ninth Circuit


US v. AMADOR-LEAL, 01-10037

In advising a criminal defendant on the consequences of a plea, a court still need not advise defendant of potential immigration consequences of his plea, despite passage of the AEDPA.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 01/09/2002
  • Published 01/09/2002

Judges

  • RYMER, Circuit Judge:, Before:  FERNANDEZ, RYMER, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellees:
  • Sigmund G. Popko, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Phoenix, Arizona, for the defendant-appellant., Georgia B. Ellexson, Chief, Appellate Section, United States Attorney's Office, Phoenix, Arizona, for the plaintiff-appellee.
Copied to clipboard