United States Ninth Circuit
US v. AMADOR-LEAL, 01-10037
In advising a criminal defendant on the consequences of a plea, a court still need not advise defendant of potential immigration consequences of his plea, despite passage of the AEDPA.
Appellate Information
- Decided 01/09/2002
- Published 01/09/2002
Judges
- RYMER, Circuit Judge:, Before: FERNANDEZ, RYMER, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Ninth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellees:
- Sigmund G. Popko, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Phoenix, Arizona, for the defendant-appellant., Georgia B. Ellexson, Chief, Appellate Section, United States Attorney's Office, Phoenix, Arizona, for the plaintiff-appellee.