Skip to main content

United States Ninth Circuit


SUMMERLIN v. STEWART, 98-99002

In a capital trial, the uncontroverted allegation that trial and sentencing judge had a drug addiction and used drugs at the time of trial is sufficient to warrant an evidentiary hearing regarding whether defendant was denied the due process right to a competent tribunal.

Appellate Information

  • Argued 03/22/2005
  • Decided 10/12/2001
  • Published 10/12/2001

Judges

  • THOMAS, Circuit Judge:, Before: SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, and PREGERSON, REINHARDT, O'SCANNLAIN, HAWKINS, THOMAS, McKEOWN, WARDLAW, W. FLETCHER, FISHER, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Ken Murray and Leticia Marquez, Federal Public Defender's Office, Phoenix, AZ, for the petitioner-appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • John Pressley Todd, Attorney General's Office, Phoenix, AZ, for the respondent-appellee.
Copied to clipboard