United States Ninth Circuit
US v. ALI, 00-10216
Loan officer's present-tense statement that bank was FDIC-insured at the time of the trial and certificate of insurance that predates the time of the bank fraud is insufficient to establish that the bank was FDIC-insured at the time of the bank fraud under 18 USC 1344(1), 1014.
Appellate Information
- Argued 05/14/2001
- Decided 10/02/2001
- Published 10/02/2001
Judges
- TASHIMA, Circuit Judge:, Before: O'SCANNLAIN, TASHIMA, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Ninth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellees:
- John D. Lyons, Assistant United States Attorney, San Francisco, California, for the plaintiff-appellee., Christopher J. Cannon, San Francisco, California, for the defendant-appellant.