Skip to main content

United States Ninth Circuit


US v. ALI, 00-10216

Loan officer's present-tense statement that bank was FDIC-insured at the time of the trial and certificate of insurance that predates the time of the bank fraud is insufficient to establish that the bank was FDIC-insured at the time of the bank fraud under 18 USC 1344(1), 1014.

Appellate Information

  • Argued 05/14/2001
  • Decided 10/02/2001
  • Published 10/02/2001

Judges

  • TASHIMA, Circuit Judge:, Before:  O'SCANNLAIN, TASHIMA, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellees:
  • John D. Lyons, Assistant United States Attorney, San Francisco, California, for the plaintiff-appellee., Christopher J. Cannon, San Francisco, California, for the defendant-appellant.
Copied to clipboard