United States Ninth Circuit

Obligations in a lease labelled as "further rent" are entitled to administrative priority even if the obligations actually represent repayments of promissory notes under 11 USC 365(d)(3).

Appellate Information

• Argued 06/11/2001
• Decided 09/07/2001
• Published 09/07/2001

Judges

• SCHROEDER, Chief Judge:, Before:  SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, LAY, and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Stephen D. Finestone,Law Offices of Stephen D. Finestone, San Francisco, California, for the appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Neil W. Bason and Robert Cross, Sideman & Bancroft LLP, San Francisco, California;  Kenneth Brown, Pachulski, Stang, Zeihl, Young & Jones, P.C., San Francisco, California, for the appellee.