Skip to main content

United States Ninth Circuit


WILDMAN v. JOHNSON, 00-35355

Where there were two separate trials, one for arson and attempted murder and the other for felon-in-possession of firearm, defense counsel did not provide ineffective assistance by failing to retain a ballistics expert in attempted murder trial where attempt did not allege firearm use.

Appellate Information

  • Argued 01/08/2001
  • Decided 08/16/2001
  • Published 08/16/2001

Judges

  • RAWLINSON, Circuit Judge:, Before:  McKEOWN, W. FLETCHER and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Mark Bennet Weintraub, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Eugene, Oregon, for the petitioner-appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Daniel J. Casey, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, Oregon, for the respondent-appellee.
Copied to clipboard