United States Ninth Circuit

Where defendant had six months notice before trial that transcriptions and translations of his surreptitiously recorded conversations with law enforcement would play a key role in the prosecution, and he could present competing evidence, district court did not abuse its discretion by admitting tapes into evidence.

Appellate Information

• Decided 07/20/2001
• Published 07/20/2001

Judges

Court

• United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel