Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

United States Ninth Circuit


US v. ENAS, 99-10049

An Indian tribe and the federal government may both prosecute a non-member Indian for the same conduct without violating the Double Jeopardy Clause because Indian tribes prosecute non-members under their inherent power, not its delegated power from the federal government.

Appellate Information

  • Argued Array
  • Decided 06/29/2001
  • Published 06/29/2001

Judges

  • Before:  PREGERSON, O'SCANNLAIN, TROTT, T.G. NELSON, KLEINFELD, TASHIMA, THOMAS, SILVERMAN, MCKEOWN, W. FLETCHER, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Richard A. Friedman, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff-appellant United States.

  • For Appellees:
  • Sigmund G. Popko, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Phoenix, Arizona, for defendant-appellee Michael L. Enas.
Copied to clipboard