Skip to main content

United States Ninth Circuit


US v. KING, 99-10478

The district court's analysis of the factors enumerated in note 3 of the commentary accompanying the 1995 version of USSG 5G1.3 must be explicitly on the record.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 04/13/2001
  • Published 04/13/2001

Judges

  • Before GRABER, FISHER and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellees:
  • Nandor Vadas, Asst. U.S. Atty., Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Francisco, CA, Amber S. Rosen, Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Jose, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee., Roger W. Patton, Oakland, CA, Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr., Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Francisco, CA, Suzanne Adele Luban, Law Office of Suzanne Luban, Oakland, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Copied to clipboard